Friday, October 21, 2005

Escalation Clauses - Potential Pitfalls for Buyers

For a detailed description of escalation clauses (what they are, how they work), please see my prior post.

Buyers often include escalation clauses in their offers in an attempt to ensure that the offer will have the best purchase price. When sellers receive multiple offers, they will consider many factors in determining which one is best, but of course the purchase price is the primary consideration. Thus, in a hot housing market such as the current one, buyers often must compete with other buyers for a particular house, and the easiest way (but not only way) to win that competition is by offering the highest price. An escalation clause helps a buyer to put forth the best purchase price possible.

So what's the downside? Before going further, I must note: interpretation and use of an escalation clause is clearly the practice of law. I have long believed that consumers benefit when lawyers provide the legal services needed when buying or selling a home. So I've launched Quill Realty, where every buyer client and every seller client is paired with an attorney to protect their interests from start to finish.

By including an escalation clause, buyers tip their hands as to the highest price they are willing to pay for the home. Sellers can use this knowldege to their advantage -- and to the disadvantage of the buyers. For example, assume that a seller indicates she will entertain all offers on a particular date. Two buyers, Buyer A and Buyer B, each put in an offer at the asking price of $400k. Recognizing the likelihood that there would be multiple offers, both buyers included an escalation clause. Buyer A's clause escalates the price in $1k increments up to a cap of $405k; Buyer B's clause escalates in $2k increments up to $420k.

When considering these offers, the seller could simply sign and return Buyer B's offer with a contract price of $407k. However, Seller could also return the offer as a counteroffer with a sale price of $420k. Admittedly, this gives Buyer B the option of accepting or rejecting the price, versus binding Buyer B to a price of $407k. Nonetheless, the seller may be willing to take this risk given an extra gain of $13k -- after all, Buyer B has already indicated a willingness to pay that amount. Thus, by tipping the seller off to his maximum price, Buyer B may end up paying it.

2 Comments:

At 1:15 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

i fell for this one.
my offer was 440001 escalated to 442511 in increments of 500.
while the second party's offer was 436 escalated to 451000 in increments of 1000.
the party came back to me with a counter offer of 442511.(since the P&S form was updated with this #)
and also the escalation form had the updated #s : competing offer : 451000, accepted offer : 442511
I did sign the offer as my agent recommended as correct.
but I am not sure if this is legally correct.
I am going to take a second opinion from an attorney tomo.
in case u have any thots, that is welcome too... :)
Thanks, r0ger_Rabbit@yahoo.com

 
At 8:52 PM, Anonymous restaurant for sale by owner said...

From a long time I am here for looking search restaurant for sale, but I am not able to find restaurant at beautiful and in great location. Please help me to search restaurant for sale.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License.